[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250801023358.562525-1-jstultz@google.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 02:33:46 +0000
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Improvements to ww_mutex test driver
As part of the proxy-exec work, I've leveraged the ww_mutex test
driver to help stress test the lock handling.
Two of these patches I've sent a few times without any
response[1], but after realizing the test wasn't exercising the
wait-wound class mutexes (only wait-die), I've extended the test
driver to now do both. This helps make sure there is more
confidence in any changes being made.
I've reworked my older changes ontop of that and wanted to send
them all out for consideration.
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
-john
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com
John Stultz (3):
test-ww_mutex: Extend ww_mutex tests to test both classes of
ww_mutexes
test-ww_mutex: Move work to its own UNBOUND workqueue
test-ww_mutex: Allow test to be run (and re-run) from userland
kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
--
2.50.1.565.gc32cd1483b-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists