[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a216d75-4411-4aa6-ae29-c7815eec248f@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 09:42:13 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: jarkko@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, asit.k.mallick@...el.com, vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com,
chongc@...gle.com, erdemaktas@...gle.com, vannapurve@...gle.com,
bondarn@...gle.com, scott.raynor@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] x86/sgx: Convert sgx_(vepc_)open to
__sgx_(vepc_)open
On 8/1/25 04:25, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> In order to introduce the counting of active sgx users on top
> of clean functions that allocate vepc structures, covert existing
> sgx_(vepc_)open to __sgx_(vepc_)open. Later patch will introduce the
> top level wrappers that manage the usage count.
>
> No functional change intended in this patch.
I'm not following at all why this patch is needed. It looks like pure
unneeded churn to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists