lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250802022550.GT222315@ZenIV>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 03:25:50 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Xiang Gao <gxxa03070307@...il.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, mjguzik@...il.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, joel.granados@...nel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gaoxiang17 <gaoxiang17@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pid: Add a judgment for ns null in pid_nr_ns

On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 10:21:23AM +0800, Xiang Gao wrote:
> From: gaoxiang17 <gaoxiang17@...omi.com>
> 
> __task_pid_nr_ns
>         ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
>         pid_nr_ns(rcu_dereference(*task_pid_ptr(task, type)), ns);
>                 if (pid && ns->level <= pid->level) {
> 
> Sometimes null is returned for task_active_pid_ns. Then it will trigger kernel panic in pid_nr_ns.

In which conditions does that happen?

> 	__task_pid_nr_ns+0x74/0xd0
> 	...
> 	__handle_irq_event_percpu+0xd4/0x284
> 	handle_irq_event+0x48/0xb0

	Huh?  Just what is it doing inside an IRQ handler?
Hell, the notion of current process is not usable in those,
let alone any properties of such...

	Details, please.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ