[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB57502860D432C3304C05D589E723A@DM8PR11MB5750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 07:16:53 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: "jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
<seanjc@...gle.com>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, "mingo@...nel.org"
<mingo@...nel.org>, "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "Mallick, Asit K"
<asit.k.mallick@...el.com>, "Scarlata, Vincent R"
<vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com>, "Cai, Chong" <chongc@...gle.com>, "Aktas,
Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>, "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
"Bondarevska, Nataliia" <bondarn@...gle.com>, "Raynor, Scott"
<scott.raynor@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 1/6] x86/sgx: Convert sgx_(vepc_)open to
__sgx_(vepc_)open
> On 8/1/25 04:25, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > In order to introduce the counting of active sgx users on top
> > of clean functions that allocate vepc structures, covert existing
> > sgx_(vepc_)open to __sgx_(vepc_)open. Later patch will introduce the
> > top level wrappers that manage the usage count.
> >
> > No functional change intended in this patch.
>
> I'm not following at all why this patch is needed. It looks like pure
> unneeded churn to me.
I am happy to merge this into patch 2 if there are no objections.
Jarkko originally wanted these two patches separated for clarity, so
I followed his suggestion.
Best Regards,
Elena.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists