linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250804094057.GJ6704@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 11:40:57 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 6.17

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 09:55:57AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 01:23:47 +0200 David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > 
> > there's are number of usability and feature updates, scattered
> > performance improvements and fixes.  Highlight of the core changes is
> > getting closer to enabling large folios (now behind a config option).
> 
> It looks like this was all rebased from what is in linux-next :-(
> 
> Please clean up the btrfs trees in linux-next.

Sorry, I forgot to push the branch for linux-next.  The code there is
the same as was pulled, the difference is one merge commit generated by
my scripts (for-next commit 442ee950ea05968). Now updated at k.org, the
previous one is in for-next-prev should anybody wan to compare them.