[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250804103052.nhpboyqcybwhomzl@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 13:30:52 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, quentin.schulz@...tlin.com,
atenart@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] phy: mscc: Fix timestamping for vsc8584
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 01:24:32PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 09:39:40AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > I think it is a great idea. I can map struct vsc8531_skb directly on
> > skb->cb and then drop the allocation.
>
> Ok.
>
> Another set of suggestions on the patch, all regarding list processing:
One more: skb queues (struct sk_buff_head) have their own API
(skb_queue_tail() etc), and more importantly, they have a spinlock
already. You should probably use that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists