[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e259390-67b1-4d08-8174-a65f1fc9eccc@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 14:27:20 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix accounting of memmap pages for early sections
On 04.08.25 11:08, Sumanth Korikkar wrote:
> memmap pages can be allocated either from the memblock (boot) allocator
> during early boot or from the buddy allocator.
>
> When these memmap pages are removed via arch_remove_memory(), the
> deallocation path depends on their source:
>
> * For pages from the buddy allocator, depopulate_section_memmap() is
> called, which also decrements the count of nr_memmap_pages.
>
> * For pages from the boot allocator, free_map_bootmem() is called. But
> it currently does not adjust the nr_memmap_boot_pages.
>
> To fix this inconsistency, update free_map_bootmem() to also decrement
> the nr_memmap_boot_pages count by invoking memmap_boot_pages_add(),
> mirroring how free_vmemmap_page() handles this for boot-allocated pages.
>
> This ensures correct tracking of memmap pages regardless of allocation
> source.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 15995a352474 ("mm: report per-page metadata information")
> Signed-off-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/sparse.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 3c012cf83cc2..d7c128015397 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
> unsigned long start = (unsigned long)memmap;
> unsigned long end = (unsigned long)(memmap + PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>
> + memmap_boot_pages_add(-1L * (DIV_ROUND_UP(end - start, PAGE_SIZE)));
> vmemmap_free(start, end, NULL);
> }
>
Looks good to me. But now I wonder about !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP,
where neither depopulate_section_memmap() nor free_map_bootmem() adjust
anything?
Which makes me wonder whether we should be moving that to
section_deactivate().
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists