[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeGbB6kJF879LmDu9X1kcNydhSZo=h4wyUeVHw_WWKBew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2025 15:13:24 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>
Cc: eugen.hristev@...aro.org, jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com,
nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, srini@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] iio: adc: at91-sama5d2_adc: add temp init function
as callback
On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 12:03 PM Varshini Rajendran
<varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> Adding the temperature sensor init function as a callback function.
> The temperature sensor initialisation sequence is handled differently
> for each platform. The same is added to the platform data of the
> corresponding device. This allows us to handle new devices like
> sama7d65.
...
> +struct at91_adc_state;
> +static int at91_adc_temp_sensor_init(struct at91_adc_state *st,
> + struct device *dev);
Isn't it possible to avoid forward declaration for the function?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists