Message-ID: <087e40e6-3b3f-4a02-8270-7e6cfdb56a04@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 07:24:38 +0300
From: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@...hat.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
 Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
 Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
 Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
 Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>, Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
 Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@...el.com>,
 Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 02/11] mm/thp: zone_device awareness in THP handling code

Hi,

On 8/5/25 07:10, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On 8/5/25 09:26, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 8/5/25 01:46, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>> On 8/2/25 22:13, Mika Penttilä wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 8/2/25 13:37, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>>> FYI:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have the following patch on top of my series that seems to make it work
>>>>> without requiring the helper to split device private folios
>>>>>
>>>> I think this looks much better!
>>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@...dia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  include/linux/huge_mm.h |  1 -
>>>>>  lib/test_hmm.c          | 11 +++++-
>>>>>  mm/huge_memory.c        | 76 ++++-------------------------------------
>>>>>  mm/migrate_device.c     | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>> index 19e7e3b7c2b7..52d8b435950b 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>>>> @@ -343,7 +343,6 @@ unsigned long thp_get_unmapped_area_vmflags(struct file *filp, unsigned long add
>>>>>  		vm_flags_t vm_flags);
>>>>>  
>>>>>  bool can_split_folio(struct folio *folio, int caller_pins, int *pextra_pins);
>>>>> -int split_device_private_folio(struct folio *folio);
>>>>>  int __split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
>>>>>  		unsigned int new_order, bool unmapped);
>>>>>  int min_order_for_split(struct folio *folio);
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
>>>>> index 341ae2af44ec..444477785882 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
>>>>> +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
>>>>> @@ -1625,13 +1625,22 @@ static vm_fault_t dmirror_devmem_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>>>>>  	 * the mirror but here we use it to hold the page for the simulated
>>>>>  	 * device memory and that page holds the pointer to the mirror.
>>>>>  	 */
>>>>> -	rpage = vmf->page->zone_device_data;
>>>>> +	rpage = folio_page(page_folio(vmf->page), 0)->zone_device_data;
>>>>>  	dmirror = rpage->zone_device_data;
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	/* FIXME demonstrate how we can adjust migrate range */
>>>>>  	order = folio_order(page_folio(vmf->page));
>>>>>  	nr = 1 << order;
>>>>>  
>>>>> +	/*
>>>>> +	 * When folios are partially mapped, we can't rely on the folio
>>>>> +	 * order of vmf->page as the folio might not be fully split yet
>>>>> +	 */
>>>>> +	if (vmf->pte) {
>>>>> +		order = 0;
>>>>> +		nr = 1;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>>  	/*
>>>>>  	 * Consider a per-cpu cache of src and dst pfns, but with
>>>>>  	 * large number of cpus that might not scale well.
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>> index 1fc1efa219c8..863393dec1f1 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>>>> @@ -72,10 +72,6 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
>>>>>  					  struct shrink_control *sc);
>>>>>  static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>>>>>  					 struct shrink_control *sc);
>>>>> -static int __split_unmapped_folio(struct folio *folio, int new_order,
>>>>> -		struct page *split_at, struct xa_state *xas,
>>>>> -		struct address_space *mapping, bool uniform_split);
>>>>> -
>>>>>  static bool split_underused_thp = true;
>>>>>  
>>>>>  static atomic_t huge_zero_refcount;
>>>>> @@ -2924,51 +2920,6 @@ static void __split_huge_zero_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>>  	pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>>>>>  }
>>>>>  
>>>>> -/**
>>>>> - * split_huge_device_private_folio - split a huge device private folio into
>>>>> - * smaller pages (of order 0), currently used by migrate_device logic to
>>>>> - * split folios for pages that are partially mapped
>>>>> - *
>>>>> - * @folio: the folio to split
>>>>> - *
>>>>> - * The caller has to hold the folio_lock and a reference via folio_get
>>>>> - */
>>>>> -int split_device_private_folio(struct folio *folio)
>>>>> -{
>>>>> -	struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
>>>>> -	struct folio *new_folio;
>>>>> -	int ret = 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> -	/*
>>>>> -	 * Split the folio now. In the case of device
>>>>> -	 * private pages, this path is executed when
>>>>> -	 * the pmd is split and since freeze is not true
>>>>> -	 * it is likely the folio will be deferred_split.
>>>>> -	 *
>>>>> -	 * With device private pages, deferred splits of
>>>>> -	 * folios should be handled here to prevent partial
>>>>> -	 * unmaps from causing issues later on in migration
>>>>> -	 * and fault handling flows.
>>>>> -	 */
>>>>> -	folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + folio_expected_ref_count(folio));
>>>>> -	ret = __split_unmapped_folio(folio, 0, &folio->page, NULL, NULL, true);
>>>>> -	VM_WARN_ON(ret);
>>>>> -	for (new_folio = folio_next(folio); new_folio != end_folio;
>>>>> -					new_folio = folio_next(new_folio)) {
>>>>> -		zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, new_folio);
>>>>> -		folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, 1 + folio_expected_ref_count(
>>>>> -								new_folio));
>>>>> -	}
>>>>> -
>>>>> -	/*
>>>>> -	 * Mark the end of the folio split for device private THP
>>>>> -	 * split
>>>>> -	 */
>>>>> -	zone_device_private_split_cb(folio, NULL);
>>>>> -	folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, 1 + folio_expected_ref_count(folio));
>>>>> -	return ret;
>>>>> -}
>>>>> -
>>>>>  static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>>>  		unsigned long haddr, bool freeze)
>>>>>  {
>>>>> @@ -3064,30 +3015,15 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>>>  				freeze = false;
>>>>>  			if (!freeze) {
>>>>>  				rmap_t rmap_flags = RMAP_NONE;
>>>>> -				unsigned long addr = haddr;
>>>>> -				struct folio *new_folio;
>>>>> -				struct folio *end_folio = folio_next(folio);
>>>>>  
>>>>>  				if (anon_exclusive)
>>>>>  					rmap_flags |= RMAP_EXCLUSIVE;
>>>>>  
>>>>> -				folio_lock(folio);
>>>>> -				folio_get(folio);
>>>>> -
>>>>> -				split_device_private_folio(folio);
>>>>> -
>>>>> -				for (new_folio = folio_next(folio);
>>>>> -					new_folio != end_folio;
>>>>> -					new_folio = folio_next(new_folio)) {
>>>>> -					addr += PAGE_SIZE;
>>>>> -					folio_unlock(new_folio);
>>>>> -					folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes(new_folio,
>>>>> -						&new_folio->page, 1,
>>>>> -						vma, addr, rmap_flags);
>>>>> -				}
>>>>> -				folio_unlock(folio);
>>>>> -				folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, &folio->page,
>>>>> -						1, vma, haddr, rmap_flags);
>>>>> +				folio_ref_add(folio, HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1);
>>>>> +				if (anon_exclusive)
>>>>> +					rmap_flags |= RMAP_EXCLUSIVE;
>>>>> +				folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, page, HPAGE_PMD_NR,
>>>>> +						 vma, haddr, rmap_flags);
>>>>>  			}
>>>>>  		}
>>>>>  
>>>>> @@ -4065,7 +4001,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
>>>>>  	if (nr_shmem_dropped)
>>>>>  		shmem_uncharge(mapping->host, nr_shmem_dropped);
>>>>>  
>>>>> -	if (!ret && is_anon)
>>>>> +	if (!ret && is_anon && !folio_is_device_private(folio))
>>>>>  		remap_flags = RMP_USE_SHARED_ZEROPAGE;
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	remap_page(folio, 1 << order, remap_flags);
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
>>>>> index 49962ea19109..4264c0290d08 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
>>>>> @@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
>>>>>  			 * page table entry. Other special swap entries are not
>>>>>  			 * migratable, and we ignore regular swapped page.
>>>>>  			 */
>>>>> +			struct folio *folio;
>>>>> +
>>>>>  			entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>>>>>  			if (!is_device_private_entry(entry))
>>>>>  				goto next;
>>>>> @@ -259,6 +261,55 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
>>>>>  			    pgmap->owner != migrate->pgmap_owner)
>>>>>  				goto next;
>>>>>  
>>>>> +			folio = page_folio(page);
>>>>> +			if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
>>>>> +				struct folio *new_folio;
>>>>> +				struct folio *new_fault_folio;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +				/*
>>>>> +				 * The reason for finding pmd present with a
>>>>> +				 * device private pte and a large folio for the
>>>>> +				 * pte is partial unmaps. Split the folio now
>>>>> +				 * for the migration to be handled correctly
>>>>> +				 */
>>>>> +				pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +				folio_get(folio);
>>>>> +				if (folio != fault_folio)
>>>>> +					folio_lock(folio);
>>>>> +				if (split_folio(folio)) {
>>>>> +					if (folio != fault_folio)
>>>>> +						folio_unlock(folio);
>>>>> +					ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmdp, addr, &ptl);
>>>>> +					goto next;
>>>>> +				}
>>>>> +
>>>> The nouveau migrate_to_ram handler needs adjustment also if split happens.
>>>>
>>> test_hmm needs adjustment because of the way the backup folios are setup.
>> nouveau should check the folio order after the possible split happens.
>>
> You mean the folio_split callback?

no, nouveau_dmem_migrate_to_ram():
..
        sfolio = page_folio(vmf->page);
        order = folio_order(sfolio);
...
        migrate_vma_setup()
..
if sfolio is split order still reflects the pre-split order

>
>>>>> +				/*
>>>>> +				 * After the split, get back the extra reference
>>>>> +				 * on the fault_page, this reference is checked during
>>>>> +				 * folio_migrate_mapping()
>>>>> +				 */
>>>>> +				if (migrate->fault_page) {
>>>>> +					new_fault_folio = page_folio(migrate->fault_page);
>>>>> +					folio_get(new_fault_folio);
>>>>> +				}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +				new_folio = page_folio(page);
>>>>> +				pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +				/*
>>>>> +				 * Ensure the lock is held on the correct
>>>>> +				 * folio after the split
>>>>> +				 */
>>>>> +				if (folio != new_folio) {
>>>>> +					folio_unlock(folio);
>>>>> +					folio_lock(new_folio);
>>>>> +				}
>>>> Maybe careful not to unlock fault_page ?
>>>>
>>> split_page will unlock everything but the original folio, the code takes the lock
>>> on the folio corresponding to the new folio
>> I mean do_swap_page() unlocks folio of fault_page and expects it to remain locked.
>>
> Not sure I follow what you're trying to elaborate on here

do_swap_page:
..
        if (trylock_page(vmf->page)) {
                ret = pgmap->ops->migrate_to_ram(vmf);
                               <- vmf->page should be locked here even after split
                unlock_page(vmf->page);

> Balbir
>
--Mika

Powered by blists - more mailing lists