[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcbcb017-e25b-4244-8ad3-9c07da99c253@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 14:30:35 +0800
From: Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Joseph Guo <qijian.guo@....com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jessica Zhang
<quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm: bridge: Add waveshare DSI2DPI unit driver
On 08/05/2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/08/2025 08:11, Liu Ying wrote:
>> On 08/05/2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/08/2025 04:22, Liu Ying wrote:
>>>> Hi Joseph,
>>>>
>>>> On 08/04/2025, Joseph Guo wrote:
>>>>> Waveshare touchscreen consists of a DPI panel and a driver board.
>>>>> The waveshare driver board consists of ICN6211 and a MCU to
>>>>> convert DSI to DPI and control the backlight.
>>>>> This driver treats the MCU and ICN6211 board as a whole unit.
>>>>> It can support all resolution waveshare DSI2DPI based panel,
>>>>> the timing table should come from 'panel-dpi' panel in the device tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Guo <qijian.guo@....com>
>>>>
>>>> For next version, you may add:
>>>> Suggested-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> As I replied in the cover letter, I provided general idea for this
>> patch series in NXP down stream kernel. Same for the DT binding patches.
>
> General idea to add support for new driver? So like every patch being a
> result of for example task from manager means "Suggested-by"? Since when
> new device support is treated as suggested-by?
Not for new driver, but for architecture level, like treating the MCU and
ICN6211 as a whole unit/DRM bridge and treating the DPI panel as a simple
panel from both DT's point of view and DRM driver's point of view.
>
> I also do not understand how downstream kernel is relevant here.
That suggestion did happen when I reviewed this patch series for downstream
kernel. Just shared the information.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
Regards,
Liu Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists