[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c53da8e9-c15d-47b4-9422-4461f0b7c188@csgroup.eu>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:41:37 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, sachinpb@...ux.ibm.com, venkat88@...ux.ibm.com,
andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, mykolal@...com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, naveen@...nel.org,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com,
memxor@...il.com, iii@...ux.ibm.com, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next 2/6] bpf,powerpc: Implement PROBE_MEM32 pseudo
instructions
Le 05/08/2025 à 08:27, Saket Kumar Bhaskar a écrit :
> Add support for [LDX | STX | ST], PROBE_MEM32, [B | H | W | DW]
> instructions. They are similar to PROBE_MEM instructions with the
> following differences:
> - PROBE_MEM32 supports store.
> - PROBE_MEM32 relies on the verifier to clear upper 32-bit of the
> src/dst register
> - PROBE_MEM32 adds 64-bit kern_vm_start address (which is stored in _R26
> in the prologue). Due to bpf_arena constructions such _R26 + reg +
> off16 access is guaranteed to be within arena virtual range, so no
> address check at run-time.
> - PROBE_MEM32 allows STX and ST. If they fault the store is a nop. When
> LDX faults the destination register is zeroed.
>
> To support these on powerpc, we do tmp1 = _R26 + src/dst reg and then use
> tmp1 as the new src/dst register. This allows us to reuse most of the
> code for normal [LDX | STX | ST].
>
> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 5 +-
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 10 ++-
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> index 4c26912c2e3c..2d095a873305 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
> @@ -161,9 +161,10 @@ struct codegen_context {
> unsigned int seen;
> unsigned int idx;
> unsigned int stack_size;
> - int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2];
> + int b2p[MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3];
> unsigned int exentry_idx;
> unsigned int alt_exit_addr;
> + u64 arena_vm_start;
> };
>
> #define bpf_to_ppc(r) (ctx->b2p[r])
> @@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg,
>
> int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass,
> struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx,
> - int jmp_off, int dst_reg);
> + int jmp_off, int dst_reg, u32 code);
>
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index c0684733e9d6..35bfdf4d8785 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
>
> /* Make sure that the stack is quadword aligned. */
> cgctx.stack_size = round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 16);
> + cgctx.arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(fp->aux->arena);
>
> /* Scouting faux-generate pass 0 */
> if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, NULL, NULL, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) {
> @@ -326,7 +327,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
> */
> int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass,
> struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx, int jmp_off,
> - int dst_reg)
> + int dst_reg, u32 code)
> {
> off_t offset;
> unsigned long pc;
> @@ -354,7 +355,12 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass
> (fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4) +
> (ctx->exentry_idx * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4);
>
> - fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0);
> + if ((BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_LDX && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM32) ||
> + (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_LDX && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM))
> + fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0);
> + else if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_ST || BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_STX)
> + fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_NOP();
> +
Is there also a 'else' to consider ? If not, why not just a 'else'
instead of an 'if else' ?
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32))
> fixup[1] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg - 1, 0); /* clear higher 32-bit register too */
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> index 0aace304dfe1..3087e744fb25 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> @@ -1087,7 +1087,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> }
>
> ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx, insn_idx,
> - jmp_off, dst_reg);
> + jmp_off, dst_reg, code);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 489de21fe3d6..16e62766c757 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> /* BPF register usage */
> #define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0)
> #define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
> +#define ARENA_VM_START (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2)
>
> /* BPF to ppc register mappings */
> void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx)
> @@ -61,6 +62,8 @@ void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx)
> ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_7] = _R28;
> ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_8] = _R29;
> ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_9] = _R30;
> + /* non volatile register for kern_vm_start address */
> + ctx->b2p[ARENA_VM_START] = _R26;
> /* frame pointer aka BPF_REG_10 */
> ctx->b2p[BPF_REG_FP] = _R31;
> /* eBPF jit internal registers */
> @@ -69,8 +72,8 @@ void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx)
> ctx->b2p[TMP_REG_2] = _R10;
> }
>
> -/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r27 */
> -#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R27
> +/* PPC NVR range -- update this if we ever use NVRs below r26 */
> +#define BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN _R26
>
> static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx)
> {
> @@ -170,10 +173,17 @@ void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))));
>
> + if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), _R1,
> + bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START))));
> +
> /* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */
> if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP)))
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_FP), _R1,
> STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size));
> +
> + if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
> + PPC_LI64(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), ctx->arena_vm_start);
> }
>
> static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
> @@ -185,6 +195,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
> if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i)))
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(i), _R1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(i))));
>
> + if (ctx->arena_vm_start)
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START), _R1,
> + bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START))));
> +
> /* Tear down our stack frame */
> if (bpf_has_stack_frame(ctx)) {
> EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R1, _R1, BPF_PPC_STACKFRAME + ctx->stack_size));
> @@ -990,6 +1004,50 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> }
> break;
>
> + case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
> + case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
> + case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
> + case BPF_STX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
> +
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
> +
> + ret = bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(ctx, src_reg, off, code, image);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> + ctx->idx - 1, 4, -1, code);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + break;
> +
> + case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
> + case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
> + case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
> + case BPF_ST | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
> +
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, dst_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
> +
> + if (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_W || BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW) {
> + PPC_LI32(tmp2_reg, imm);
> + src_reg = tmp2_reg;
> + } else {
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, imm));
> + src_reg = tmp2_reg;
> + }
> +
> + ret = bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(ctx, src_reg, off, code, image);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> + ctx->idx - 1, 4, -1, code);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + break;
> +
> /*
> * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
> */
> @@ -1142,9 +1200,10 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
> * Check if 'off' is word aligned for BPF_DW, because
> * we might generate two instructions.
> */
> - if ((BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW ||
> - (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX)) &&
> - (off & 3))
> + if ((BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW && (off & 3)) ||
> + (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B &&
> + BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX) ||
> + (BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_B && BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_MEMSX))
> PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
> else
> PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 2) * 4);
> @@ -1190,12 +1249,49 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
>
> if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
> ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> - ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg);
> + ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg, code);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> break;
>
> + /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + ARENA_VM_START + off) */
> + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_B:
> + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
> + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
> + case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
> +
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(tmp1_reg, src_reg, bpf_to_ppc(ARENA_VM_START)));
> +
> + switch (size) {
> + case BPF_B:
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> + break;
> + case BPF_H:
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LHZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> + break;
> + case BPF_W:
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LWZ(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> + break;
> + case BPF_DW:
> + if (off % 4) {
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, off));
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LDX(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg));
> + } else {
> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(dst_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (size != BPF_DW && insn_is_zext(&insn[i + 1]))
> + addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4;
> +
> + ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx,
> + ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg, code);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + break;
> +
> /*
> * Doubleword load
> * 16 byte instruction that uses two 'struct bpf_insn'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists