lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250805084726.2054-1-ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Date: Tue,  5 Aug 2025 16:47:26 +0800
From: Adrian Huang <adrianhuang0701@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.79.tang@...il.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Huang <ahuang12@...ovo.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mm: Correct misleading comment on mmap_lock field in mm_struct

From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@...ovo.com>

The comment previously described the offset of mmap_lock as 0x120 (hex),
which is misleading. The correct value is 120 (decimal), and using '0x120'
could confuse readers trying to understand why the count and owner fields
reside in separate cachelines.

This change also removes an unnecessary space for improved formatting.

Fixes: 2e3025434a6b ("mm: relocate 'write_protect_seq' in struct mm_struct")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@...ovo.com>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 1ec273b06691..ec90bbf22e2b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -1027,9 +1027,9 @@ struct mm_struct {
 					     */
 		/*
 		 * With some kernel config, the current mmap_lock's offset
-		 * inside 'mm_struct' is at 0x120, which is very optimal, as
+		 * inside 'mm_struct' is at 120, which is very optimal, as
 		 * its two hot fields 'count' and 'owner' sit in 2 different
-		 * cachelines,  and when mmap_lock is highly contended, both
+		 * cachelines, and when mmap_lock is highly contended, both
 		 * of the 2 fields will be accessed frequently, current layout
 		 * will help to reduce cache bouncing.
 		 *
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ