[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7e36755-9255-4209-9d53-20077bd1d3ba@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 14:49:29 +0530
From: Sarthak Garg <quic_sartgarg@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter
<adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_cang@...cinc.com>, <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>,
<quic_rampraka@...cinc.com>, <quic_pragalla@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sayalil@...cinc.com>, <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
<quic_bhaskarv@...cinc.com>, <kernel@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Remove SDR104/SDR50
broken capabilities
On 8/1/2025 2:32 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/08/2025 10:45, Sarthak Garg wrote:
>> The kernel now handles level shifter limitations affecting SD card
>> modes, making it unnecessary to explicitly disable SDR104 and SDR50
>> capabilities in the device tree.
>>
>> However, due to board-specific hardware constraints particularly related
>> to level shifter in this case the maximum frequency for SD High-Speed
>> (HS) mode must be limited to 37.5 MHz to ensure reliable operation of SD
>> card in HS mode. This is achieved using the max-sd-hs-frequency property
>> in the board DTS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <quic_sartgarg@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-hdk.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-mtp.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550-sony-xperia-yodo-pdx234.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 3 ---
>> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>
> This will break MMC for all of the users and nothing in commit msg or
> cover letter explains that or mentions merging strategy.
>
> Exactly this case is covered by your internal guideline, no? Please read it.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Just to make sure I’m addressing the right concern — are you primarily
worried about the introduction of the max-sd-hs-frequency property in
the board DTS files, or about the removal of the sdhci-caps-mask
from the common sm8550.dtsi?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists