lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c72396b5a9757913e061c0aa7f3d488b57a8a64.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 14:42:05 +0200
From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers
	 <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, David Hildenbrand
	 <david@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra
	 <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] sched: Compact RSEQ concurrency IDs in batches

On Wed, 2025-07-16 at 18:06 +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> Currently, task_mm_cid_work() is called from resume_user_mode_work().
> This can delay the execution of the corresponding thread for the
> entire duration of the function, negatively affecting the response in
> case of real time tasks.
> In practice, we observe task_mm_cid_work increasing the latency of
> 30-35us on a 128 cores system, this order of magnitude is meaningful
> under PREEMPT_RT.
> 
> Run the task_mm_cid_work in batches of up to
> CONFIG_RSEQ_CID_SCAN_BATCH CPUs, this reduces the duration of the
> delay for each scan.
> 
> The task_mm_cid_work contains a mechanism to avoid running more
> frequently than every 100ms. Keep this pseudo-periodicity only on
> complete scans.
> This means each call to task_mm_cid_work returns prematurely if the
> period did not elapse and a scan is not ongoing (i.e. the next batch
> to scan is not the first).
> This way full scans are not excessively delayed while still keeping
> each run, and introduced latency, short.
> 

Mathieu, would you have some time to look at this implementation?

Thanks,
Gabriele

> Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by
> mm_cid")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm_types.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  init/Kconfig             | 12 ++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/core.c      | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index e6d6e468e64b4..a822966a584f3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -995,6 +995,13 @@ struct mm_struct {
>  		 * When the next mm_cid scan is due (in jiffies).
>  		 */
>  		unsigned long mm_cid_next_scan;
> +		/*
> +		 * @mm_cid_scan_batch: Counter for batch used in the
> next scan.
> +		 *
> +		 * Scan in batches of CONFIG_RSEQ_CID_SCAN_BATCH.
> This field
> +		 * increments at each scan and reset when all
> batches are done.
> +		 */
> +		unsigned int mm_cid_scan_batch;
>  		/**
>  		 * @nr_cpus_allowed: Number of CPUs allowed for mm.
>  		 *
> @@ -1385,6 +1392,7 @@ static inline void mm_init_cid(struct mm_struct
> *mm, struct task_struct *p)
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&mm->cpus_allowed_lock);
>  	cpumask_copy(mm_cpus_allowed(mm), &p->cpus_mask);
>  	cpumask_clear(mm_cidmask(mm));
> +	mm->mm_cid_scan_batch = 0;
>  }
>  
>  static inline int mm_alloc_cid_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
> task_struct *p)
> @@ -1423,8 +1431,15 @@ static inline void mm_set_cpus_allowed(struct
> mm_struct *mm, const struct cpumas
>  
>  static inline bool mm_cid_needs_scan(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> +	unsigned int next_batch;
> +
>  	if (!mm)
>  		return false;
> +	next_batch = READ_ONCE(mm->mm_cid_scan_batch);
> +	/* Always needs scan unless it's the first batch. */
> +	if (CONFIG_RSEQ_CID_SCAN_BATCH * next_batch <
> num_possible_cpus() &&
> +	    next_batch)
> +		return true;
>  	return time_after(jiffies, READ_ONCE(mm->mm_cid_next_scan));
>  }
>  #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID */
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index 666783eb50abd..98d7f078cd6df 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1860,6 +1860,18 @@ config DEBUG_RSEQ
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config RSEQ_CID_SCAN_BATCH
> +	int "Number of CPUs to scan at every mm_cid compaction
> attempt"
> +	range 1 NR_CPUS
> +	default 8
> +	depends on SCHED_MM_CID
> +	help
> +	  CPUs are scanned pseudo-periodically to compact the CID of
> each task,
> +	  this operation can take a longer amount of time on systems
> with many
> +	  CPUs, resulting in higher scheduling latency for the
> current task.
> +	  A higher value means the CID is compacted faster, but
> results in
> +	  higher scheduling latency.
> +
>  config CACHESTAT_SYSCALL
>  	bool "Enable cachestat() system call" if EXPERT
>  	default y
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 27b856a1cb0a9..eae4c8faf980b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -10591,11 +10591,26 @@ static void
> sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_weight(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu,
>  
>  void task_mm_cid_work(struct task_struct *t)
>  {
> +	int weight, cpu, from_cpu, this_batch, next_batch, idx;
>  	unsigned long now = jiffies, old_scan, next_scan;
>  	struct cpumask *cidmask;
> -	int weight, cpu;
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = t->mm;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * This function is called from __rseq_handle_notify_resume,
> which
> +	 * makes sure t is a user thread and is not exiting.
> +	 */
> +	this_batch = READ_ONCE(mm->mm_cid_scan_batch);
> +	next_batch = this_batch + 1;
> +	from_cpu = cpumask_nth(this_batch *
> CONFIG_RSEQ_CID_SCAN_BATCH,
> +			       cpu_possible_mask);
> +	if (from_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
> +		from_cpu = 0;
> +		next_batch = 1;
> +	}
> +	/* Delay scan only if we are done with all cpus. */
> +	if (from_cpu != 0)
> +		goto cid_compact;
>  	old_scan = READ_ONCE(mm->mm_cid_next_scan);
>  	next_scan = now + msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY);
>  	if (!old_scan) {
> @@ -10611,17 +10626,33 @@ void task_mm_cid_work(struct task_struct
> *t)
>  		return;
>  	if (!try_cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_next_scan, &old_scan,
> next_scan))
>  		return;
> +
> +cid_compact:
> +	if (!try_cmpxchg(&mm->mm_cid_scan_batch, &this_batch,
> next_batch))
> +		return;
>  	cidmask = mm_cidmask(mm);
>  	/* Clear cids that were not recently used. */
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +	idx = 0;
> +	cpu = from_cpu;
> +	for_each_cpu_from(cpu, cpu_possible_mask) {
> +		if (idx == CONFIG_RSEQ_CID_SCAN_BATCH)
> +			break;
>  		sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_old(mm, cpu);
> +		++idx;
> +	}
>  	weight = cpumask_weight(cidmask);
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear cids that are greater or equal to the cidmask
> weight to
>  	 * recompact it.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +	idx = 0;
> +	cpu = from_cpu;
> +	for_each_cpu_from(cpu, cpu_possible_mask) {
> +		if (idx == CONFIG_RSEQ_CID_SCAN_BATCH)
> +			break;
>  		sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_weight(mm, cpu, weight);
> +		++idx;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  void init_sched_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ