[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d0c1bb9-2f85-4d55-b5ab-40a4ac9bfffe@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:19:53 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lizhe.67@...edance.com" <lizhe.67@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] VFIO updates for v6.17-rc1
On 05.08.25 15:15, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 16:05, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> So I don't like the idea of micro-optimizing num_pages_contiguous() by
>> adding weird tweaks to the core for that.
>
> Seriously - take a look at that suggested sequence I posted, and tell
> me that it isn't *MORE* obvious than the horror that is nth_page().
It is, that's not what I am talking about. I was talking about proposals
to make it work in a different way as Jason proposed.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists