lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <839fe8af-3157-427a-b059-50eccd594d0e@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:55:32 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
 "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "lizhe.67@...edance.com" <lizhe.67@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] VFIO updates for v6.17-rc1

On 05.08.25 15:51, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 16:47, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> arch/x86/Kconfig:       select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE if X86_64
>>
>> But SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is still user-selectable.
> 
> I think you missed this confusion on x86:

Yeah ...

> 
>          select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP if X86_64
> 
> IOW, that SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE is entirely historical, I think,
> and it's unconditional these days.

Same for arm64. The other seem to still allow for configuring it. 
Probably we could really just force-enable it for the others that 
support it.

Then fence of gigantic folios and remove most of the nth_page hackery 
when we're working within a folio.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ