[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <839fe8af-3157-427a-b059-50eccd594d0e@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:55:32 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lizhe.67@...edance.com" <lizhe.67@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] VFIO updates for v6.17-rc1
On 05.08.25 15:51, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 16:47, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> arch/x86/Kconfig: select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE if X86_64
>>
>> But SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is still user-selectable.
>
> I think you missed this confusion on x86:
Yeah ...
>
> select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP if X86_64
>
> IOW, that SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE is entirely historical, I think,
> and it's unconditional these days.
Same for arm64. The other seem to still allow for configuring it.
Probably we could really just force-enable it for the others that
support it.
Then fence of gigantic folios and remove most of the nth_page hackery
when we're working within a folio.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists