[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <o4snk6isxzpkgmcgr7ff2zfuqwqvd5mbvbff5d3cd7jspiljwb@pv57a63fyfin>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:13:15 +0100
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Stefano Manni <stefano.manni@...il.com>, lars@...afoo.de,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
andy@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad799x: add reference supply for ad7994
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 03:13:06PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 2:28 PM Stefano Manni <stefano.manni@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > AD7994 supports the external reference voltage on pin REFIN.
>
> ...
>
> > - if ((st->id == ad7991) || (st->id == ad7995) || (st->id == ad7999)) {
> > + if ((st->id == ad7991) || (st->id == ad7995) || (st->id == ad7999)
> > + (st->id == ad7994)) {
>
> Instead of making this conditional longer and uglier, it is better to
> add a boolean field to chip_info and just check it instead. This will
> remove the churn when any new chip will require the same change in the
> future.
>
> So, please make it two patches:
> - introducing a field in chip_info and use it for the existing cases
> - add this field to be true for the ad7994 case.
Agreed!
Plus either is already too late for my eyes but I don't think this patch
is compilable.
- Nuno Sá
>
> Is it doable?
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists