linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 10/36] ACPI / MPAM: Parse the MPAM table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2a503013-ae89-44a4-9851-2571c7ef6e70@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 18:08:15 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>,
 Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, Zeng Heng
 <zengheng4@...wei.com>, Lecopzer Chen <lecopzerc@...dia.com>,
 Carl Worth <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
 shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>, lcherian@...vell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
 Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
 dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
 Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/36] ACPI / MPAM: Parse the MPAM table

Hi Ben,

On 24/07/2025 11:50, Ben Horgan wrote:
> On 11/07/2025 19:36, James Morse wrote:
>> Add code to parse the arm64 specific MPAM table, looking up the cache
>> level from the PPTT and feeding the end result into the MPAM driver.

>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..f4791bac9a2a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/mpam.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,365 @@

>> +static int acpi_mpam_parse_resource(struct mpam_msc *msc,
>> +                    struct acpi_mpam_resource_node *res)
>> +{
>> +    int level, nid;
>> +    u32 cache_id;
>> +
>> +    switch (res->locator_type) {
>> +    case ACPI_MPAM_LOCATION_TYPE_PROCESSOR_CACHE:
>> +        cache_id = res->locator.cache_locator.cache_reference;
>> +        level = find_acpi_cache_level_from_id(cache_id);
>> +        if (level < 0) {
>> +            pr_err_once("Bad level (%u) for cache with id %u\n", level, cache_id);
>> +            return -EINVAL;

> Nit: More robust to check for level <= 0.

Sure, that can probably happen!


Thanks,

James