linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/12] docs: kdoc: further rewrite_struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250806232701.67b707ee@foz.lan>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 23:27:01 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa
 <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] docs: kdoc: further rewrite_struct_members()
 cleanup

Em Wed, 06 Aug 2025 07:00:19 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> escreveu:

> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> >> > Btw, on this specific case, better to use non-capture group matches
> >> > to avoid those "empty" spaces, e.g. (if I got it right):    
> >> 
> >> The problem is this line here:
> >> 
> >>                 oldmember = "".join(t) # Reconstruct the original formatting
> >> 
> >> The regex *has* to capture the entire match string so that it can be
> >> reconstructed back to its original form, which we need to edit the full
> >> list of members later on.
> >> 
> >> This code could use a deep rethink, but it works for now :)  
> >
> > well, we can still do:
> >
> > 	for t in tuples:
> > 	    maintype, -, -, content, -, s_ids = t
> > 	    oldmember = "".join(t)
> >
> > this way, we'll be naming the relevant parameters and reconstructing
> > the the original form.  
> 
> I've already made a change much like that (the "-" syntax doesn't work,
> of course);

Gah! sorry for the typo. I meant to say:

	maintype, _, _, content, _, s_ids = t

> I hope to post the updates series today, but it's going to
> be busy.
> 
> > Btw, while re.findall() has an API that doesn't return match
> > objects which is incoherent with the normal re API, while looking
> > at the specs today(*), there is an alternative: re.finditer(). 
> > We could add it to KernRE cass and use it on a way that it will use
> > a Match instance. Something like:
> >
> > 	# Original regex expression
> > 	res = Re.finditer(...)
> > [...]  
> 
> A definite possible improvement for later... :)

Ok.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon



Thanks,
Mauro