| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e8c39250-e9a0-4075-92b2-ffa2344a9212@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 08:59:59 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>,
Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, sachinpb@...ux.ibm.com, andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com, mykolal@...com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, naveen@...nel.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, memxor@...il.com, iii@...ux.ibm.com,
shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next 1/6] bpf,powerpc: Introduce
bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store() to emit store instructions
Le 05/08/2025 à 13:59, Venkat Rao Bagalkote a écrit :
>
> On 05/08/25 1:04 pm, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 05/08/2025 à 08:27, Saket Kumar Bhaskar a écrit :
>>> bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store() is introduced to emit instructions for
>>> storing memory values depending on the size (byte, halfword,
>>> word, doubleword).
>>
>> Build break with this patch
>>
>> CC arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.o
>> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c:395:12: error:
>> 'bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-
>> function]
>> static int bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(struct codegen_context *ctx,
>> u32 src_reg, s16 off,
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:287: arch/powerpc/net/
>> bpf_jit_comp64.o] Error 1
>>
> I tried this on top of bpf-next, and for me build passed.
Build of _this_ patch (alone) passed ?
This patch defines a static function but doesn't use it, so the build
must breaks because of that, unless you have set CONFIG_PPC_DISABLE_WERROR.
Following patch starts using this function so then the build doesn't
break anymore. But until next patch is applied the build doesn't work.
Both patches have to be squashed together in order to not break
bisectability of the kernel.
Christophe
>
> Note: I applied https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?
> url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fbpf%2F20250717202935.29018-2-
> puranjay%40kernel.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C0468473019834e07ef2b08ddd4179b9c%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638899920058624267%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iZLg9NUWxtH3vO1STI8wRYLzwvhohd2KKTAGYDe3WnM%3D&reserved=0 before applying current patch.
>
> gcc version 14.2.1 20250110
>
> uname -r: 6.16.0-gf2844c7fdb07
>
> bpf-next repo: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?
> url=https%3A%2F%2Fkernel.googlesource.com%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fbpf%2Fbpf-next&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C0468473019834e07ef2b08ddd4179b9c%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638899920058644309%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OrMauttrzPbaFYhzKdkH5l%2FltISc95MwitnUC7YLhJQ%3D&reserved=0
>
> HEAD:
>
> commit f3af62b6cee8af9f07012051874af2d2a451f0e5 (origin/master, origin/
> HEAD)
> Author: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
> Date: Wed Jul 23 22:44:42 2025 +0800
>
> bpftool: Add bash completion for token argument
>
>
> Build Success logs:
>
> TEST-OBJ [test_progs-cpuv4] xdp_vlan.test.o
> TEST-OBJ [test_progs-cpuv4] xdpwall.test.o
> TEST-OBJ [test_progs-cpuv4] xfrm_info.test.o
> BINARY bench
> BINARY test_maps
> BINARY test_progs
> BINARY test_progs-no_alu32
> BINARY test_progs-cpuv4
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Venkat.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/
>>> bpf_jit_comp64.c
>>> index 025524378443..489de21fe3d6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
>>> @@ -409,6 +409,36 @@ asm (
>>> " blr ;"
>>> );
>>> +static int bpf_jit_emit_probe_mem_store(struct codegen_context
>>> *ctx, u32 src_reg, s16 off,
>>> + u32 code, u32 *image)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 tmp1_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_1);
>>> + u32 tmp2_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG_2);
>>> +
>>> + switch (BPF_SIZE(code)) {
>>> + case BPF_B:
>>> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STB(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
>>> + break;
>>> + case BPF_H:
>>> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STH(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
>>> + break;
>>> + case BPF_W:
>>> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
>>> + break;
>>> + case BPF_DW:
>>> + if (off % 4) {
>>> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(tmp2_reg, off));
>>> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STDX(src_reg, tmp1_reg, tmp2_reg));
>>> + } else {
>>> + EMIT(PPC_RAW_STD(src_reg, tmp1_reg, off));
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int emit_atomic_ld_st(const struct bpf_insn insn, struct
>>> codegen_context *ctx, u32 *image)
>>> {
>>> u32 code = insn.code;
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists