linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <94757d00-5a8e-ac6b-f832-030f33ccf771@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:11:18 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@....com>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
	<sstabellini@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <puranjay@...nel.org>,
	<broonie@...nel.org>, <mbenes@...e.cz>, <ryan.roberts@....com>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <chenl311@...natelecom.cn>,
	<anshuman.khandual@....com>, <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
	<liaochang1@...wei.com>, <ardb@...nel.org>, <leitao@...ian.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v7 0/7] arm64: entry: Convert to generic irq entry



On 2025/8/5 23:08, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> Hi Jinjie,
> 
> On 29/07/2025 02:54, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
>> Since commit a70e9f647f50 ("entry: Split generic entry into generic
>> exception and syscall entry") split the generic entry into generic irq
>> entry and generic syscall entry, it is time to convert arm64 to use
>> the generic irq entry. And ARM64 will be completely converted to generic
>> entry in the upcoming patch series.
> Note : I had to manually cherry-pick a70e9f647f50 when pulling the series
> on top of the Linux Arm Kernel for-next/core branch, but there might be
> something I'm missing here.
>>

It seems that it is now in mainline v6.16-rc1 and linux-next but not
Linux Arm Kernel for-next/core branch.

[...]

> I'll spend some time testing the series now, specifically given patch 6's
> changes, but other than that everything I saw made sense and didn't look
> like it would be of concern to me.

Thank you for the test and review.

> 
> Thanks,
> Ada
>