linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Document the Glymur TCSR Clock Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5d75904a-05f5-4cee-9ff3-821b692f6a6f@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 15:27:26 +0530
From: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@....qualcomm.com, Pankaj Patil <quic_pankpati@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Document the Glymur TCSR
 Clock Controller



On 8/1/2025 2:40 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/08/2025 06:14, Taniya Das wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/30/2025 12:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 11:12:36AM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>> Add bindings documentation for the Glymur TCSR Clock Controller.
>>>
>>> Same question as for v1, what is Glymur?
>>
>> Glymur is the Qualcomm's next gen compute SoC.
> 
> Explain it in at least one commit msg, not in reply to me.
> 

Yes, I will explain it in my next patchset.

>>
>>>
>>> Where is any DTS using this (or explanation of lack of DTS)?
>>>
>>
>> Krzysztof, the DTS will be posted separately once the driver and
>> bindings are reviewed.
> 
> Hm? That's not what I was told thus I ask. I am sure that above is not
> true, but if you insist and put it that way it is incorrect. You cannot
> send DTS because you wait with drivers to be reviewed. We want to see
> entire picture.
> 

Sorry for the confusion, Krzysztof. What I meant to convey is that we
plan to post the DTS after the public announcement of the SoC, which is
expected to happen within the next couple of months. In the meantime,
we’re hoping to get the code reviewed.

-- 
Thanks,
Taniya Das