[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5584937d-0941-487a-859b-b3c55aceaf37@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 17:42:24 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>,
"Pankaj Dubey" <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>, ksk4725 <ksk4725@...sia.com>,
"Jesper Nilsson" <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
"'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Sylwester Nawrocki" <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
"Chanwoo Choi" <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Tomasz Figa" <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>
Cc: kenkim <kenkim@...sia.com>, "Jongshin Park" <pjsin865@...sia.com>,
"GunWoo Kim" <gwk1013@...sia.com>, "HaGyeong Kim" <hgkim05@...sia.com>,
"GyoungBo Min" <mingyoungbo@...sia.com>, "SungMin Park" <smn1196@...sia.com>,
"Shradha Todi" <shradha.t@...sung.com>,
"'Ravi Patel'" <ravi.patel@...sung.com>, "Inbaraj E" <inbaraj.e@...sung.com>,
"Swathi K S" <swathi.ks@...sung.com>, Hrishikesh <hrishikesh.d@...sung.com>,
"Dongjin Yang" <dj76.yang@...sung.com>,
"Sang Min Kim" <hypmean.kim@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...s.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, soc@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Add support for the Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025, at 11:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/08/2025 11:05, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>>
>> or ARTPEC is manufactured (ODM) by another vendor in that case, won't it
>> create problems?
>
>
> No problems here. Non-Samsung Artpec/Axis soc will not go there. It will
> go the top-level axis directory, just like artpec-6
Agreed. We did have a case where something gradually changed
instead of changing ODMs entirely:
Apple A4 was mostly an Exynos-family chip but A18 is not.
If Axis turns into the next Apple and ARTPEC-23 is far enough
removed from ARTPEC-9 to no longer fit into the same family
as Exynos/Tensor/FSD, we can still reconsider the decision
in a decade.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists