[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMvTesAmCyO6XF-sRtMKw=TwKgeqaEkMQTmtkZbA7P-zeqDg6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 00:04:45 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
Cc: "kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>, "haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>, "decui@...rosoft.com" <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com" <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>, Tianyu Lan <tiala@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V6 2/4 Resend] Drivers: hv: Allow vmbus message synic
interrupt injected from Hyper-V
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 10:11 PM Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 5:19 AM
> >
> > When Secure AVIC is enabled, VMBus driver should
> > call x2apic Secure AVIC interface to allow Hyper-V
> > to inject VMBus message interrupt.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <tiala@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> > Change since RFC V5:
> > - Rmove extra line and move hv_enable_coco_interrupt()
> > just after hv_set_msr() in the hv_synic_disable_regs().
> >
> > Change since RFC V4:
> > - Change the order to call hv_enable_coco_interrupt()
> > in the hv_synic_enable/disable_regs().
> > - Update commit title "Drivers/hv:" to "Drivers: hv:"
> >
> > Change since RFC V3:
> > - Disable VMBus Message interrupt via hv_enable_
> > coco_interrupt() in the hv_synic_disable_regs().
> > ---
> > arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c | 5 +++++
> > drivers/hv/hv.c | 7 ++++++-
> > drivers/hv/hv_common.c | 5 +++++
> > include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> > index 01bc02cc0590..c9808a51fa37 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
> > @@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ static void hv_apic_icr_write(u32 low, u32 id)
> > wrmsrq(HV_X64_MSR_ICR, reg_val);
> > }
> >
> > +void hv_enable_coco_interrupt(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int vector, bool set)
> > +{
> > + apic_update_vector(cpu, vector, set);
> > +}
> > +
> > static u32 hv_apic_read(u32 reg)
> > {
> > u32 reg_val, hi;
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv.c b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > index 308c8f279df8..d68a96de1626 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/hv.c
> > @@ -312,10 +312,13 @@ void hv_synic_enable_regs(unsigned int cpu)
> > shared_sint.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT);
> >
> > shared_sint.vector = vmbus_interrupt;
> > +
>
> The spurious blank line is still here.
>
> > shared_sint.masked = false;
> > shared_sint.auto_eoi = hv_recommend_using_aeoi();
> > hv_set_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64);
> >
> > + hv_enable_coco_interrupt(cpu, vmbus_interrupt, true);
> > +
> > /* Enable the global synic bit */
> > sctrl.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SCONTROL);
> > sctrl.enable = 1;
> > @@ -342,7 +345,6 @@ void hv_synic_disable_regs(unsigned int cpu)
> > union hv_synic_scontrol sctrl;
> >
> > shared_sint.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT);
> > -
> > shared_sint.masked = 1;
> >
> > /* Need to correctly cleanup in the case of SMP!!! */
> > @@ -350,6 +352,9 @@ void hv_synic_disable_regs(unsigned int cpu)
> > hv_set_msr(HV_MSR_SINT0 + VMBUS_MESSAGE_SINT, shared_sint.as_uint64);
> >
> > simp.as_uint64 = hv_get_msr(HV_MSR_SIMP);
> > +
> > + hv_enable_coco_interrupt(cpu, vmbus_interrupt, false);
> > +
>
> This line is still in the wrong place. Maybe you accidentally resent
> the previous version of the patch instead of the version with your
> intended changes?
>
> Michael
Hi Michael:
I just sent out an update version. Sorry for confusion.
--
Thanks
Tianyu Lan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists