[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tt2kct09.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 18:30:30 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
kprateek.nayak@....com, vineethr@...ux.ibm.com,
prakash.sangappa@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 00/11] Scheduler time slice extension
On Thu, Jul 24 2025 at 16:16, Prakash Sangappa wrote:
> Based on v6.16-rc3.
This is useless. At the point of posting, a massive amount of changes
had been queued for the 6.17 merge window. So why can't you submit
against the relevant tree (tip) as asked for in Documentation?
I'm going to look at it from a conceptual level nevertheless to spare
you the extra round.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists