[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250807075810.358714-3-urezki@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 09:58:04 +0200
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] lib/test_vmalloc: Remove xfail condition check
A test marked with "xfail = true" is expected to fail but that
does not mean it is predetermined to fail. Remove "xfail" condition
check for tests which pass successfully.
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
---
lib/test_vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
index aae5f4910aff..6521c05c7816 100644
--- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
+++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int test_func(void *private)
for (j = 0; j < test_repeat_count; j++) {
ret = test_case_array[index].test_func();
- if (!ret && !test_case_array[index].xfail)
+ if (!ret)
t->data[index].test_passed++;
else if (ret && test_case_array[index].xfail)
t->data[index].test_xfailed++;
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists