[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250807121327.GG184255@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 09:13:27 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/16] dma-mapping: convert dma_direct_*map_page to be
phys_addr_t based
On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 03:42:41PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.h
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h
> @@ -80,42 +80,54 @@ static inline void dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
> arch_dma_mark_clean(paddr, size);
> }
>
> -static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_page(struct device *dev,
> - struct page *page, unsigned long offset, size_t size,
> - enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> +static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
> + phys_addr_t phys, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
> + unsigned long attrs)
> {
> - phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(page) + offset;
> - dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, phys);
> + bool is_mmio = attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO;
> + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> + bool capable;
> +
> + dma_addr = (is_mmio) ? phys : phys_to_dma(dev, phys);
> + capable = dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, is_mmio);
> + if (is_mmio) {
> + if (unlikely(!capable))
> + goto err_overflow;
> + return dma_addr;
Similar remark here, shouldn't we be checking swiotlb things for
ATTR_MMIO and failing if swiotlb is needed?
> - if (is_swiotlb_force_bounce(dev)) {
> - if (is_pci_p2pdma_page(page))
> - return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
This
> - if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true)) ||
> - dma_kmalloc_needs_bounce(dev, size, dir)) {
> - if (is_pci_p2pdma_page(page))
> - return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
And this
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists