linux-kernel - Re: [Upstream] Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: freescale: imx93-phycore-som: Delay the phy reset by a gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <39243f47f601253ebf6e7ef30475f70ec2a932a4.camel@phytec.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 12:53:09 +0000
From: Christoph Stoidner <C.Stoidner@...tec.de>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam
	<festevam@...il.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "upstream@...ts.phytec.de"
	<upstream@...ts.phytec.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [Upstream] Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: freescale:
 imx93-phycore-som: Delay the phy reset by a gpio

Hello Shawn,

sorry for bothering.

Can you tell me if there's anything missing or wrong with this patch,
or if there's anything else I can do so that it becomes applied?

Thanks and regards,
Christoph

On Fr, 2025-07-18 at 17:33 +0000, Christoph Stoidner wrote:
> On Di, 2025-07-08 at 10:35 +0200, Primoz Fiser wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > is there something holding up this patch?
> 
> I dont see any blocker.
> @Maintainers: If there is any missing/blocking point, could you
> please comment.
> 
> Thanks,
> Christoph
> 
> > 
> > BR,
> > Primoz
> > 
> > On 2. 06. 25 14:26, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > > I agree it is long enough, but i'm also surprised how slow
> > > > > the
> > > > > kernel
> > > > > was. Are you using a fixed IP address, or dhcp?
> > > > 
> > > > I use a fixed IP address.
> > > > 
> > > > But isn't the bringup of ethernet+phy interface one of the last
> > > > things
> > > > that happens during the kernel boot-up?
> > > 
> > > Mounting the rootfs is somewhat towards the end of the core
> > > kernel. But if you have an initramfs, there can be modules loaded
> > > both
> > > before and afterwards, and once the rootfs has been mounted, yet
> > > more
> > > modules can be loaded.
> > > 
> > > > However, what timing would you expect?
> > > 
> > > I've seen interfaces configured up from deep within
> > > register_netdev(). I don't remember the exact configuration, but
> > > i
> > > thought it was NFS root. It might be in combination with
> > > initramfs.
> > > If
> > > you have the Ethernet driver as a module in the initramfs, and
> > > are
> > > using the "rootwait" option, it could be that you are already
> > > past
> > > the
> > > point it would first mount the rootfs, and with every new device
> > > popping into existence it is trying to see if the just created
> > > device
> > > allows it to do the mount. At that point, register_netdev() is
> > > going
> > > to trigger actions.
> > > 
> > >  Andrew
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > upstream mailing list -- upstream@...ts.phytec.de
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to upstream-leave@...ts.phytec.de
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> upstream mailing list -- upstream@...ts.phytec.de
> To unsubscribe send an email to upstream-leave@...ts.phytec.de