[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3277f21-14c4-40ca-9d48-a0aeecb54fb8@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 08:56:28 -0500
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>,
Julien Panis <jpanis@...libre.com>,
William Breathitt Gray
<wbg@...nel.org>
CC: <kernel@...s.com>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] counter: ti-ecap-capture: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable()
On 8/7/25 8:21 AM, Waqar Hameed wrote:
> There is no need to register a manual `devm` action for
> `pm_runtime_disable()` when `devm_pm_runtime_enable()` exists. It does
> the same thing (but also calls `pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()`,
> which should be fine here).
>
> Moreover, when `devm_add_action_or_reset()` fails, it is due to a failed
> memory allocation and will thus return `-ENOMEM`. `dev_err_probe()`
> doesn't do anything when error is `-ENOMEM`. Therefore, the call to
> `dev_err_probe()` is useless. Note that `devm_pm_runtime_enable()` has a
> tail call to `devm_add_action_or_reset()` and thus returns that value.
> Therefore, replace `dev_err_probe()` with the returning value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@...s.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> Changes in v3:
>
> * Remove the manual `devm_add_action_or_reset()` and use
> `devm_pm_runtime_enable()` instead.
>
> Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/pndms8em7tf.a.out@axis.com/
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> * Split the patch to one seperate patch for each sub-system.
>
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/pnd7c0s6ji2.fsf@axis.com/
>
> drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c b/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c
> index 3faaf7f60539..3586a7ab9887 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/ti-ecap-capture.c
> @@ -465,11 +465,6 @@ static irqreturn_t ecap_cnt_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static void ecap_cnt_pm_disable(void *dev)
> -{
> - pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> -}
> -
> static int ecap_cnt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -523,12 +518,9 @@ static int ecap_cnt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, counter_dev);
>
> - pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> -
> - /* Register a cleanup callback to care for disabling PM */
> - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ecap_cnt_pm_disable, dev);
> + ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to add pm disable action\n");
> + return ret;
>
> ret = devm_counter_add(dev, counter_dev);
> if (ret)
>
> base-commit: 260f6f4fda93c8485c8037865c941b42b9cba5d2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists