lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0fdab5ac-604b-46fd-bd25-cfa7afd06f98@prolan.hu>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 16:46:26 +0200
From: Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "Sascha
 Hauer" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
	<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx6-karo: Replace license text comment with
 SPDX identifier

Hi,

On 2025. 07. 03. 11:09, Bence Csókás wrote:
> Replace verbatim license text with a `SPDX-License-Identifier`
> 
> The comment header mis-attributes this license to be "X11", but the
> license text does not include the last line "Except as contained in this
> notice, the name of the X Consortium shall not be used in advertising or
> otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealings in this Software
> without prior written authorization from the X Consortium.". Therefore,
> this license is actually equivalent to the SPDX "MIT" license (confirmed
> by text diffing).
> 
> Cc: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
> Acked-By: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
> Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - fix message tags and typos
> - collect Lothar's Ack

So, what do you think, is this patch acceptable now this way?

Bence


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ