[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250807162521.GA50955@bhelgaas>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 11:25:21 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Shradha Gupta <shradhagupta@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...ei.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PCI/MSI: Add startup/shutdown support for per device
MSI[X] domains
In subject, s/MSI[X]// and s/support for/for/
The "MSI[X]" notation really isn't used anywhere else, and we already
include "PCI/MSI" in the prefix, so I don't think we need it again.
On Thu, Aug 07, 2025 at 07:23:23PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> As The RISC-V PLIC can not apply affinity setting without calling
> irq_enable(), it will make the interrupt unavaible when using as
> an underlying irq chip for MSI controller.
s/As The/As the/
s/unavaible/unavailable/
s/irq chip/IRQ chip/
> Introduce the irq_startup/irq_shutdown for PCI domain template with
> new MSI domain flag. This allow the PLIC can be properly configurated
> when calling irq_startup().
Maybe something like:
Implement .irq_startup() and .irq_shutdown() for the PCI MSI and
MSI-X templates. For chips that specify MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_STARTUP_PARENT,
these startup and shutdown the parent as well, which allows ...
s/This allow/This allows/
s/can be properly configurated/to be configured/
Evidently PLIC depends on this "parent" connection, but that isn't
explained at all in the commit log.
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/msi.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c b/drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c
> index 0938ef7ebabf..f0d18cadbe20 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,23 @@ static void pci_device_domain_set_desc(msi_alloc_info_t *arg, struct msi_desc *d
> arg->hwirq = desc->msi_index;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline void cond_shutdown_parent(struct irq_data *data)
Is there a functional reason why we need __always_inline?
If not, it seems like this annotation is just clutter, and the compiler
will probably inline it all by itself.
> +{
> + struct msi_domain_info *info = data->domain->host_data;
> +
> + if (unlikely(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_STARTUP_PARENT))
> + irq_chip_shutdown_parent(data);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline unsigned int cond_startup_parent(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct msi_domain_info *info = data->domain->host_data;
> +
> + if (unlikely(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_STARTUP_PARENT))
> + return irq_chip_startup_parent(data);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static __always_inline void cond_mask_parent(struct irq_data *data)
> {
> struct msi_domain_info *info = data->domain->host_data;
> @@ -164,6 +181,23 @@ static __always_inline void cond_unmask_parent(struct irq_data *data)
> irq_chip_unmask_parent(data);
> }
>
> +static void pci_irq_shutdown_msi(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct msi_desc *desc = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
> +
> + pci_msi_mask(desc, BIT(data->irq - desc->irq));
> + cond_shutdown_parent(data);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int pci_irq_startup_msi(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct msi_desc *desc = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
> + unsigned int ret = cond_startup_parent(data);
> +
> + pci_msi_unmask(desc, BIT(data->irq - desc->irq));
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void pci_irq_mask_msi(struct irq_data *data)
> {
> struct msi_desc *desc = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
> @@ -194,6 +228,8 @@ static void pci_irq_unmask_msi(struct irq_data *data)
> static const struct msi_domain_template pci_msi_template = {
> .chip = {
> .name = "PCI-MSI",
> + .irq_startup = pci_irq_startup_msi,
> + .irq_shutdown = pci_irq_shutdown_msi,
> .irq_mask = pci_irq_mask_msi,
> .irq_unmask = pci_irq_unmask_msi,
> .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg,
> @@ -210,6 +246,20 @@ static const struct msi_domain_template pci_msi_template = {
> },
> };
>
> +static void pci_irq_shutdown_msix(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + pci_msix_mask(irq_data_get_msi_desc(data));
> + cond_shutdown_parent(data);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int pci_irq_startup_msix(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + unsigned int ret = cond_startup_parent(data);
> +
> + pci_msix_unmask(irq_data_get_msi_desc(data));
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void pci_irq_mask_msix(struct irq_data *data)
> {
> pci_msix_mask(irq_data_get_msi_desc(data));
> @@ -234,6 +284,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_msix_prepare_desc);
> static const struct msi_domain_template pci_msix_template = {
> .chip = {
> .name = "PCI-MSIX",
> + .irq_startup = pci_irq_startup_msix,
> + .irq_shutdown = pci_irq_shutdown_msix,
> .irq_mask = pci_irq_mask_msix,
> .irq_unmask = pci_irq_unmask_msix,
> .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg,
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index e5e86a8529fb..3111ba95fbde 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -568,6 +568,8 @@ enum {
> MSI_FLAG_PARENT_PM_DEV = (1 << 8),
> /* Support for parent mask/unmask */
> MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_MASK_PARENT = (1 << 9),
> + /* Support for parent startup/shutdown */
> + MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSI_STARTUP_PARENT = (1 << 10),
>
> /* Mask for the generic functionality */
> MSI_GENERIC_FLAGS_MASK = GENMASK(15, 0),
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists