| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250807174613.1895006-1-wakel@google.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 01:46:13 +0800
From: Wake Liu <wakel@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: wakel@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/seccomp: improve backwards compatibility for older kernels
This commit introduces checks for kernel version and seccomp filter flag
support to the seccomp selftests. It also includes conditional header
inclusions using __GLIBC_PREREQ.
Some tests were gated by kernel version, and adjustments were made for
flags introduced after kernel 5.4. This ensures the selftests can run
and pass correctly on kernel versions 5.4 and later, preventing failures
due to features not present in older kernels.
The use of __GLIBC_PREREQ ensures proper compilation and functionality
across different glibc versions in a mainline Linux kernel context.
While it might appear redundant in specific build environments due to
global overrides, it is crucial for upstream correctness and portability.
Signed-off-by: Wake Liu <wakel@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 61acbd45ffaa..9b660cff5a4a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -13,12 +13,14 @@
* we need to use the kernel's siginfo.h file and trick glibc
* into accepting it.
*/
+#if defined(__GLIBC__) && defined(__GLIBC_PREREQ)
#if !__GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 26)
# include <asm/siginfo.h>
# define __have_siginfo_t 1
# define __have_sigval_t 1
# define __have_sigevent_t 1
#endif
+#endif
#include <errno.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
@@ -300,6 +302,26 @@ int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args)
}
#endif
+int seccomp_flag_supported(int flag)
+{
+ /*
+ * Probes if a seccomp filter flag is supported by the kernel.
+ *
+ * When an unsupported flag is passed to seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, ...),
+ * the kernel returns EINVAL.
+ *
+ * When a supported flag is passed, the kernel proceeds to validate the
+ * filter program pointer. By passing NULL for the filter program,
+ * the kernel attempts to dereference a bad address, resulting in EFAULT.
+ *
+ * Therefore, checking for EFAULT indicates that the flag itself was
+ * recognized and supported by the kernel.
+ */
+ if (seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL) == -1 && errno == EFAULT)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
#define syscall_arg(_n) (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[_n]))
#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
@@ -2436,13 +2458,12 @@ TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags)
ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) {
TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
}
- EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
- EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) {
- TH_LOG("Failed to detect that a known-good filter flag (0x%X) is supported!",
- flag);
- }
- all_flags |= flag;
+ if (seccomp_flag_supported(flag))
+ all_flags |= flag;
+ else
+ TH_LOG("Filter flag (0x%X) is not found to be supported!",
+ flag);
}
/*
@@ -2870,6 +2891,12 @@ TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence)
TEST_F(TSYNC, two_siblings_with_one_divergence_no_tid_in_err)
{
+ /* Depends on 5189149 (seccomp: allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together) */
+ if (!seccomp_flag_supported(SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH");
+ return;
+ }
+
long ret, flags;
void *status;
@@ -3475,6 +3502,11 @@ TEST(user_notification_basic)
TEST(user_notification_with_tsync)
{
+ /* Depends on 5189149 (seccomp: allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together) */
+ if (!seccomp_flag_supported(SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel does not support SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH");
+ return;
+ }
int ret;
unsigned int flags;
@@ -3966,6 +3998,13 @@ TEST(user_notification_filter_empty)
TEST(user_ioctl_notification_filter_empty)
{
+ /* Depends on 95036a7 (seccomp: interrupt SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV
+ * when all users have exited) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(6, 11)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 6.11");
+ return;
+ }
+
pid_t pid;
long ret;
int status, p[2];
@@ -4119,6 +4158,12 @@ int get_next_fd(int prev_fd)
TEST(user_notification_addfd)
{
+ /* Depends on 0ae71c7 (seccomp: Support atomic "addfd + send reply") */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(5, 14)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 5.14");
+ return;
+ }
+
pid_t pid;
long ret;
int status, listener, memfd, fd, nextfd;
@@ -4281,6 +4326,12 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd)
TEST(user_notification_addfd_rlimit)
{
+ /* Depends on 7cf97b1 (seccomp: Introduce addfd ioctl to seccomp user notifier) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(5, 9)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 5.9");
+ return;
+ }
+
pid_t pid;
long ret;
int status, listener, memfd;
@@ -4326,9 +4377,12 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd_rlimit)
EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
EXPECT_EQ(errno, EMFILE);
- addfd.flags = SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND;
- EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
- EXPECT_EQ(errno, EMFILE);
+ /* Depends on 0ae71c7 (seccomp: Support atomic "addfd + send reply") */
+ if (ksft_min_kernel_version(5, 14)) {
+ addfd.flags = SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SEND;
+ EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(listener, SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD, &addfd), -1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EMFILE);
+ }
addfd.newfd = 100;
addfd.flags = SECCOMP_ADDFD_FLAG_SETFD;
@@ -4356,6 +4410,12 @@ TEST(user_notification_addfd_rlimit)
TEST(user_notification_sync)
{
+ /* Depends on 48a1084 (seccomp: add the synchronous mode for seccomp_unotify) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(6, 6)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 6.6");
+ return;
+ }
+
struct seccomp_notif req = {};
struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {};
int status, listener;
@@ -4520,6 +4580,12 @@ static char get_proc_stat(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, pid_t pid)
TEST(user_notification_fifo)
{
+ /* Depends on 4cbf6f6 (seccomp: Use FIFO semantics to order notifications) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(5, 19)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 5.19");
+ return;
+ }
+
struct seccomp_notif_resp resp = {};
struct seccomp_notif req = {};
int i, status, listener;
@@ -4623,6 +4689,12 @@ static long get_proc_syscall(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, int pid)
/* Ensure non-fatal signals prior to receive are unmodified */
TEST(user_notification_wait_killable_pre_notification)
{
+ /* Depends on c2aa2df (seccomp: Add wait_killable semantic to seccomp user notifier) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(5, 19)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 5.19");
+ return;
+ }
+
struct sigaction new_action = {
.sa_handler = signal_handler,
};
@@ -4693,6 +4765,12 @@ TEST(user_notification_wait_killable_pre_notification)
/* Ensure non-fatal signals after receive are blocked */
TEST(user_notification_wait_killable)
{
+ /* Depends on c2aa2df (seccomp: Add wait_killable semantic to seccomp user notifier) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(5, 19)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 5.19");
+ return;
+ }
+
struct sigaction new_action = {
.sa_handler = signal_handler,
};
@@ -4772,6 +4850,12 @@ TEST(user_notification_wait_killable)
/* Ensure fatal signals after receive are not blocked */
TEST(user_notification_wait_killable_fatal)
{
+ /* Depends on c2aa2df (seccomp: Add wait_killable semantic to seccomp user notifier) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(5, 19)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 5.19");
+ return;
+ }
+
struct seccomp_notif req = {};
int listener, status;
pid_t pid;
@@ -4854,6 +4938,12 @@ static void *tsync_vs_dead_thread_leader_sibling(void *_args)
*/
TEST(tsync_vs_dead_thread_leader)
{
+ /* Depends on bfafe5e (seccomp: release task filters when the task exits) */
+ if (!ksft_min_kernel_version(6, 11)) {
+ SKIP(return, "Kernel version < 6.11");
+ return;
+ }
+
int status;
pid_t pid;
long ret;
--
2.50.1.703.g449372360f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists