[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98e3bdfc-41ed-40b6-92df-4aacab3d92c5@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 20:19:09 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ming.lei@...hat.com, dlemoal@...nel.org,
jack@...e.cz
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
johnny.chenyi@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] lib/sbitmap: convert shallow_depth from one word
to the whole sbitmap
On 8/6/25 7:30 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ? 2025/08/06 17:41, kernel test robot ??:
>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from ./arch/sparc/include/generated/asm/div64.h:1,
>> from include/linux/math.h:6,
>> from include/linux/kernel.h:27,
>> from include/linux/cpumask.h:11,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h:15,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/smp.h:7,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/switch_to_32.h:5,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/switch_to.h:7,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/ptrace.h:120,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h:19,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info.h:7,
>> from include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
>> from arch/sparc/include/asm/current.h:15,
>> from include/linux/sched.h:12,
>> from lib/sbitmap.c:7:
>> lib/sbitmap.c: In function '__map_depth_with_shallow':
>> include/asm-generic/div64.h:183:35: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
>> 183 | (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \
>> | ^~
>> lib/sbitmap.c:222:20: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div'
>> 222 | reminder = do_div(shallow_word_depth, sb->depth);
>> | ^~~~~~
>
> /* The unnecessary pointer compare is there
> * to check for type safety (n must be 64bit)
> */
> # define do_div(n,base) ({
>
> I didn't notice that under specific arch, do_div() will require the fist
> paramater to be 64bit.
>
> I'll wait a bit longer for people to review the solution before I send a
> new version.
I think it looks good, so please do spin a new version with that fixed
as that's the only thing holding up the inclusion right now.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists