[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250809184800.129831-11-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2025 14:47:55 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
Subject: [PATCH -rebased 10/15] sched/deadline: Account ext server bandwidth
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
Always account for both the ext_server and fair_server bandwidths,
especially during CPU hotplug operations. Ignoring either can lead to
imbalances in total_bw when sched_ext schedulers are active and CPUs are
brought online / offline.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
kernel/sched/topology.c | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 17f8cd5df1aa..92ca2f5b7cb9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2981,9 +2981,17 @@ void dl_clear_root_domain(struct root_domain *rd)
* them, we need to account for them here explicitly.
*/
for_each_cpu(i, rd->span) {
- struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &cpu_rq(i)->fair_server;
+ struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se;
- if (dl_server(dl_se) && cpu_active(i))
+ if (!cpu_active(i))
+ continue;
+
+ dl_se = &cpu_rq(i)->fair_server;
+ if (dl_server(dl_se))
+ __dl_add(&rd->dl_bw, dl_se->dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(i));
+
+ dl_se = &cpu_rq(i)->ext_server;
+ if (dl_server(dl_se))
__dl_add(&rd->dl_bw, dl_se->dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(i));
}
}
@@ -3478,6 +3486,7 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
struct dl_bw *dl_b;
bool overflow = 0;
u64 fair_server_bw = 0;
+ u64 ext_server_bw = 0;
rcu_read_lock_sched();
dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
@@ -3510,27 +3519,31 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
cap -= arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
/*
- * cpu is going offline and NORMAL tasks will be moved away
- * from it. We can thus discount dl_server bandwidth
- * contribution as it won't need to be servicing tasks after
- * the cpu is off.
+ * cpu is going offline and NORMAL and EXT tasks will be
+ * moved away from it. We can thus discount dl_server
+ * bandwidth contribution as it won't need to be servicing
+ * tasks after the cpu is off.
*/
if (cpu_rq(cpu)->fair_server.dl_server)
fair_server_bw = cpu_rq(cpu)->fair_server.dl_bw;
+ if (cpu_rq(cpu)->ext_server.dl_server)
+ ext_server_bw = cpu_rq(cpu)->ext_server.dl_bw;
+
/*
* Not much to check if no DEADLINE bandwidth is present.
* dl_servers we can discount, as tasks will be moved out the
* offlined CPUs anyway.
*/
- if (dl_b->total_bw - fair_server_bw > 0) {
+ if (dl_b->total_bw - fair_server_bw - ext_server_bw > 0) {
/*
* Leaving at least one CPU for DEADLINE tasks seems a
* wise thing to do. As said above, cpu is not offline
* yet, so account for that.
*/
if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu) - 1)
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, fair_server_bw, 0);
+ overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap,
+ fair_server_bw + ext_server_bw, 0);
else
overflow = 1;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 977e133bb8a4..f4574b0cf8eb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -508,6 +508,11 @@ void rq_attach_root(struct rq *rq, struct root_domain *rd)
if (rq->fair_server.dl_server)
__dl_server_attach_root(&rq->fair_server, rq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT
+ if (rq->ext_server.dl_server)
+ __dl_server_attach_root(&rq->ext_server, rq);
+#endif
+
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
if (old_rd)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists