linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] generic/1228: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aJhpVROJPYlz2gNB@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 15:11:41 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, john.g.garry@...cle.com,
        tytso@....edu, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] generic/1228: Add atomic write multi-fsblock
 O_[D]SYNC tests

On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 07:54:23AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 07:23:58PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:35:10AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > > +verify_atomic_write() {
> > > > +	if [[ "$1" == "shutdown" ]]
> > > > +	then
> > > > +		local do_shutdown=1
> > > > +	fi
> > > > +
> > > > +	test $bytes_written -eq $awu_max || _fail "atomic write len=$awu_max assertion failed"
> > > > +
> > > > +	if [[ $do_shutdown -eq "1" ]]
> > > > +	then
> > > > +		echo "Shutting down filesystem" >> $seqres.full
> > > > +		_scratch_shutdown >> $seqres.full
> > > > +		_scratch_cycle_mount >>$seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "remount failed for Test-3"
> > > > +	fi
> > > > +
> > > > +	check_data_integrity
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +mixed_mapping_test() {
> > > > +	prep_mixed_mapping
> > > > +
> > > > +	echo "+ + Performing O_DSYNC atomic write from 0 to $awu_max" >> $seqres.full
> > > > +	bytes_written=$($XFS_IO_PROG -dc "pwrite -DA -V1 -b $awu_max 0 $awu_max" $testfile | \
> > > > +		        grep wrote | awk -F'[/ ]' '{print $2}')
> > > > +
> > > > +	verify_atomic_write $1
> > > 
> > > The shutdown happens after the synchronous write completes?  If so, then
> > > what part of recovery is this testing?
> > > 
> > > --D
> > 
> > Right, it is mostly inspired by [1] where sometimes isize update could
> > be lost after dio completion. Although this might not exactly be
> > affected by atomic writes, we added it here out of caution.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/434beffaf18d39f898518ea9eb1cea4548e77c3a.1695383715.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
> 
> Ah, so we're racing with background log flush then.  Would it improve
> the potential failure detection rate to call shutdown right after the
> pwrite, e.g.
> 
> $XFS_IO_PROG -dxc "pwrite -DA..." -c 'shutdown' $testfile
> 
> It can take a few milliseconds to walk down the bash functions and
> fork/exec another child process.

Sounds good, I can make that change.

Thanks!
> 
> --D
> 
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> >