[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250810192542.1443ecb5@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 19:25:42 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Gustavo Silva <gustavograzs@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Alex Lanzano
<lanzano.alex@...il.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno
Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lothar Rubusch
<l.rubusch@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] iio: imu: bmi270: add support for motion events
On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 19:26:03 -0300
Gustavo Silva <gustavograzs@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2025 at 12:58:21PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > >
> > I got lost in this thread, so perhaps am assuming there is a v5 to come.
> >
> > Maybe just send one anyway even if no changes as it'll jump up my list to look at.
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Yes, I’ve yet to send v5. Just a quick reminder: patches 1 and 2 from
> this series were already accepted as of v3.
>
> Regarding v5, would it make sense to split it into two separate patches:
> one for the motion events and another for the ABI documentation?
I'm a bit lost (and short on time, after a garage door crisis - always
have spare cables and helpful friends - both of which I did :)
Anyhow, if ABI is custom in same patch as the code that implements it.
If documenting new or existing (docs missing) then separate patch.
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists