[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c497e75-bdb7-45ee-96ba-e293e33db91b@foss.st.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:30:08 +0200
From: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@...s.st.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
<kwilczynski@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
<cassel@...nel.org>, <shradha.t@...sung.com>,
<thippeswamy.havalige@....com>, <quic_schintav@...cinc.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/9] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe host support for STM32MP25
On 8/8/25 18:45, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 04:55:52PM +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
>> On 8/7/25 20:09, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> [+to Linus for pinctrl usage question below]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 11:07:07AM +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
>>>> Add driver for the STM32MP25 SoC PCIe Gen1 2.5 GT/s and Gen2 5GT/s
>>>> controller based on the DesignWare PCIe core.
>
>>>> + return pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
>>>
>>> Isn't there some setup required before we can use
>>> pinctrl_select_state(), pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(),
>>> pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(), etc?
>>>
>>> I expected something like devm_pinctrl_get() in the .probe() path, but
>>> I don't see anything. I don't know how pinctrl works, but I don't see
>>> how dev->pins gets set up.
>>
>> Linus knows better, but the dev->pins states are attached to the dev struct
>> before probe by the pinctrl driver
>>
>> /**
>> * pinctrl_bind_pins() - called by the device core before probe
>> * @dev: the device that is just about to probe
>> */
>> int pinctrl_bind_pins(struct device *dev)
>
> Thanks for the pointer. Might be worthy of a mention in
> Documentation/driver-api/pin-control.rst. Maybe pinctrl/consumer.h
> could even have a bread crumb to that effect since drivers use all
> those interfaces that rely in the implicit initialization done before
> their .probe().
>
> pin-control.rst mentions pinctrl_get_select_default() being called
> just before the driver probe, but that's now unused and it looks like
> pinctrl_bind_pins() does something similar:
>
> really_probe
> pinctrl_bind_pins
> dev->pins = devm_kzalloc()
> devm_pinctrl_get
> pinctrl_lookup_state(PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT)
> pinctrl_lookup_state(PINCTRL_STATE_INIT)
> pinctrl_select_state(init) # if present, else default
> call_driver_probe
Yeah, and state_init is not mentioned in the documentation even for the
'normal probe'. The only doc I see from the original commit
ef0eebc05130b0d22b0ea65c0cd014ee16fc89c7
"
Let's introudce a new "init" state. If this is defined we'll set
pinctrl to this state before probe and then "default" after probe
(unless the driver explicitly changed states already).
"
I will propose something in pin-control.rst, with maybe some code-block
for the pm part and respin [PATCH 0/2] Add pinctrl_pm_select_init_state
helper function...
Christian
>
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists