lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250811-gpio-mmio-mfd-conv-v1-1-68c5c958cf80@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:36:16 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
 Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, 
 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: vexpress-sysreg: check the return value of
 devm_gpiochip_add_data()

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>

Commit 974cc7b93441 ("mfd: vexpress: Define the device as MFD cells")
removed the return value check from the call to gpiochip_add_data() (or
rather gpiochip_add() back then and later converted to devres) with no
explanation. This function however can still fail, so check the return
value and bail-out if it does.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 974cc7b93441 ("mfd: vexpress: Define the device as MFD cells")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
index fc2daffc4352cca763cefbf6e17bdd5242290198..77245c1e5d7df497fda2f6dd8cfb08b5fbcee719 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/vexpress-sysreg.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ static int vexpress_sysreg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct resource *mem;
 	void __iomem *base;
 	struct gpio_chip *mmc_gpio_chip;
+	int ret;
 
 	mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	if (!mem)
@@ -119,7 +120,10 @@ static int vexpress_sysreg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	bgpio_init(mmc_gpio_chip, &pdev->dev, 0x4, base + SYS_MCI,
 			NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0);
 	mmc_gpio_chip->ngpio = 2;
-	devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, mmc_gpio_chip, NULL);
+
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, mmc_gpio_chip, NULL);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	return devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
 			vexpress_sysreg_cells,

-- 
2.48.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ