linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250811-wachen-formel-29492e81ee59@brauner>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:18:22 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Shivank Garg <shivankg@....com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES

On Fri, 08 Aug 2025 15:28:47 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Christoph suggested that the explicit _GPL_ can be dropped from the
> module namespace export macro, as it's intended for in-tree modules
> only. It would be possible to restrict it technically, but it was
> pointed out [2] that some cases of using an out-of-tree build of an
> in-tree module with the same name are legitimate. But in that case those
> also have to be GPL anyway so it's unnecessary to spell it out in the
> macro name.
> 
> [...]

Ok, so last I remember we said that this is going upstream rather sooner
than later before we keep piling on users. If that's still the case I'll
take it via vfs.fixes unless I hear objections.

---

Applied to the vfs.fixes branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
Patches in the vfs.fixes branch should appear in linux-next soon.

Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.

It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.

Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
branch: vfs.fixes

[1/1] module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES
      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/6d3c3ca4c77e