[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250811141740.GPaJn7hKNmLGV24WTZ@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:17:40 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/22] x86: strict separation of startup code
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 09:27:09AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Changes since v5:
> - Some cosmetic touchups to patch #1
> - Fix error spotted by Tom in patch #2
> - Rejig objtool 'noabs' feature using an arch hook to check for
> relocations that should be considered absolute, which includes all of
> R_X86_64_32, R_X86_64_32S and R_X86_64_64 on x86_64
Ok, seems to work here.
You could send a final version with the minor issues addressed so that I can
queue it and test it more.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists