[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALSpo=b4dO3B=U5+cfc3P0NnrtMf7_FJv6+vOPHCS_ezZR2XJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:18:07 -0700
From: Jesse Taube <jesse@...osinc.com>
To: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@...du.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
alex@...ti.fr, ajones@...tanamicro.com, cleger@...osinc.com,
charlie@...osinc.com, evan@...osinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Use for_each_online_cpu() instead of for_each_cpu()
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 11:34 PM Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@...du.com> wrote:
>
> Replace the opencoded for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) loop with the
> more readable and equivalent for_each_online_cpu(cpu) macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@...du.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> index ae2068425fbc..5e11b1bd9b2a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/unaligned_access_speed.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
> * Allocate separate buffers for each CPU so there's no fighting over
> * cache lines.
> */
> - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> bufs[cpu] = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
> if (!bufs[cpu]) {
> pr_warn("Allocation failure, not measuring misaligned performance\n");
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void __init check_unaligned_access_speed_all_cpus(void)
> smp_call_on_cpu(0, check_unaligned_access, bufs[0], true);
>
> out:
> - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
Good find.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@...osinc.com>
> if (bufs[cpu])
> __free_pages(bufs[cpu], MISALIGNED_BUFFER_ORDER);
> }
> --
> 2.36.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists