[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a2c4b1c-e3ef-4d1d-ae93-ff744fdd7bf6@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:50:52 +0100
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpuidle: governors: menu: Avoid using invalid recent
intervals data
On 8/11/25 16:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Marc has reported that commit 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid
> discarding useful information") caused the number of wakeup interrupts
> to increase on an idle system [1], which was not expected to happen
> after merely allowing shallower idle states to be selected by the
> governor in some cases.
>
> However, on the system in question, all of the idle states deeper than
> WFI are rejected by the driver due to a firmware issue [2]. This causes
> the governor to only consider the recent interval duriation data
duration
> corresponding to attempts to enter WFI that are successful and the
> recent invervals table is filled with values lower than the scheduler
intervals
> tick period. Consequently, the governor predicts an idle duration
> below the scheduler tick period length and avoids stopping the tick
> more often which leads to the observed symptom.
>
> Address it by modifying the governor to update the recent intervals
> table also when entering the previously selected idle state fails, so
> it knows that the short idle intervals might have been the minority
> had the selected idle states been actually entered every time.
>
> Fixes: 85975daeaa4d ("cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/86o6sv6n94.wl-maz@kernel.org/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/7ffcb716-9a1b-48c2-aaa4-469d0df7c792@arm.com/ [2]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,14 @@
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);
>
> +static void menu_update_intervals(struct menu_device *data, unsigned int interval_us)
> +{
> + /* Update the repeating-pattern data. */
> + data->intervals[data->interval_ptr++] = interval_us;
> + if (data->interval_ptr >= INTERVALS)
> + data->interval_ptr = 0;
> +}
> +
> static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev);
>
> /*
> @@ -222,6 +230,14 @@
> if (data->needs_update) {
> menu_update(drv, dev);
> data->needs_update = 0;
> + } else if (!dev->last_residency_ns) {
> + /*
> + * This happens when the driver rejects the previously selected
> + * idle state and returns an error, so update the recent
> + * intervals table to prevent invalid information from being
> + * used going forward.
> + */
> + menu_update_intervals(data, UINT_MAX);
> }
>
> /* Find the shortest expected idle interval. */
> @@ -482,10 +498,7 @@
>
> data->correction_factor[data->bucket] = new_factor;
>
> - /* update the repeating-pattern data */
> - data->intervals[data->interval_ptr++] = ktime_to_us(measured_ns);
> - if (data->interval_ptr >= INTERVALS)
> - data->interval_ptr = 0;
> + menu_update_intervals(data, ktime_to_us(measured_ns));
> }
>
> /**
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists