[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adb94e86-38a2-4456-9363-d02c487ff7b8@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 21:42:29 +0530
From: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>, <bvanassche@....org>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Document MCQ register
space for UFS
On 11-Aug-25 8:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/08/2025 16:31, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> Document Multi-Circular Queue (MCQ) register space for
>> Qualcomm UFS controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 16 ++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> index 6c6043d9809e..daf681b0e23b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> @@ -89,9 +89,13 @@ properties:
>> maxItems: 2
>>
>> reg-names:
>> - items:
>> - - const: std
>> - - const: ice
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - const: std
>> + - const: ice
>> + - items:
>> + - const: ufs_mem
>> + - const: mcq
>
> No. Why are you sending this? You have been Cc-ed here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250731-dt-bindings-ufs-qcom-v2-3-53bb634bf95a@linaro.org/
Hi Krzysztof,
I understand I was Cc-ed on the patch thread you linked. However, if I send my patch on top of yours before it’s merged, the kernel bot might flag it due to missing base changes. Please let me know if you're okay with that — I can proceed with pushing my patch on top of yours.
Thanks,
Ram.
>
> Above is neither correct nor aligned with what I told you.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists