linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: Enable MCQ support for UFS controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9ff100b4-a3a5-4364-8172-1ccb5566e50c@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 22:24:29 +0530
From: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <mani@...nel.org>,
        <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>, <bvanassche@....org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: Enable MCQ support for
 UFS controller



On 11-Aug-25 8:13 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/08/2025 16:31, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> Enable Multi-Circular Queue (MCQ) support for the UFS host controller
>> on the Qualcomm SM8650 platform by updating the device tree node. This
>> includes adding new register region for MCQ and specifying the MSI parent
>> required for MCQ operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 7 ++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Way you organize your patchset is confusing. Why DTS is in the middle?
> It suggests dependency and this would be strong objection from me.

Hi Krzysztof,

My current patch submission order is as follows:

1.DT binding
2.Device tree
3.Driver changes

Please let me know if you'd prefer to rearrange the order and place the driver patch in the middle.


Regards,
Ram
> 
> Please read carefully writing bindings, submitting patches in DT and SoC
> maintainer profile.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof