[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250811170007.646981-1-james@egdaemon.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 13:00:07 -0400
From: James Lawrence <jalexanderlawrence@...il.com>
To: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev
Cc: admin@...inas.su,
gbcox@....us,
jalexanderlawrence@...il.com,
josef@...icpanda.com,
linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
list-bcachefs@...lthompson.net,
malte.schroeder@...ip.de,
sashal@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Peanut gallery 2c
fair enough, I was less explicit about which are which. btrfs has mostly a branding issue at this stage, which is fairly rough to dig out of.
You would know better than I would since you're directly in the weeds. I only have prior experiences and old cases to go off, of most of which are out dated at this point, and im primarily interested in raid 5/6 usecases.
Which is why I've mostly stayed out of the lkml drama until now. But removal doesnt resolve the problems with the linux filesystem ecosystem
and it'd be a disservice to everyone to lose convienent access to the work you've done.
crossing my fingers your work will remain,
James Lawrence
Principal Engineer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists