lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <175451397101.1420.5655871917271400595.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 20:59:30 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Waiman Long" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: smp/urgent] cpu: Remove obsolete comment from takedown_cpu()

The following commit has been merged into the smp/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     da274853fe7dbc7124e2dd84dad802be52a09321
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/da274853fe7dbc7124e2dd84dad802be52a09321
Author:        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:12:32 -04:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 22:48:12 +02:00

cpu: Remove obsolete comment from takedown_cpu()

takedown_cpu() has a comment about "all preempt/rcu users must observe
!cpu_active()" which is kind of meaningless in this function. This
comment was originally introduced by commit 6acce3ef8452 ("sched: Remove
get_online_cpus() usage") when _cpu_down() was setting cpu_active_mask
and synchronize_rcu()/synchronize_sched() were added after that.

Later commit 40190a78f85f ("sched/hotplug: Convert cpu_[in]active
notifiers to state machine") added a new CPUHP_AP_ACTIVE hotplug
state to set/clear cpu_active_mask. The following commit b2454caa8977
("sched/hotplug: Move sync_rcu to be with set_cpu_active(false)")
move the synchronize_*() calls to sched_cpu_deactivate() associated
with the new hotplug state, but left the comment behind.

Remove this comment as it is no longer relevant in takedown_cpu().

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250729191232.664931-1-longman@redhat.com

---
 kernel/cpu.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index faf0f23..db9f6c5 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -1309,9 +1309,6 @@ static int takedown_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	 */
 	irq_lock_sparse();
 
-	/*
-	 * So now all preempt/rcu users must observe !cpu_active().
-	 */
 	err = stop_machine_cpuslocked(take_cpu_down, NULL, cpumask_of(cpu));
 	if (err) {
 		/* CPU refused to die */

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ