[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39c67e57-e4e6-46ba-bd61-46afc650381c@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:09:42 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memory: stm32_omm: Fix req2ack update test
On 07/08/2025 09:34, Patrice Chotard wrote:
> If "st,omm-req2ack-ns" property is found and its value is not 0,
> the current test doesn't allow to compute and set req2ack value,
> Fix this test.
>
> Fixes: 8181d061dcff ("memory: Add STM32 Octo Memory Manager driver")
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Add more detail in commit message
> - Remove "Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>" tag as the fixed patch is not part of a LTS.
Why LTS would matter? Which kernel is being fixed here?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists