[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPVz0n13OB5fk1TySCP13h7ZotMERCMK=Tp1xTTVgA-qFrJNTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:15:29 +0300
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: display: tegra: document EPP, ISP,
MPE and TSEC for Tegra114+
пн, 11 серп. 2025 р. о 11:11 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> пише:
>
> On 11/08/2025 10:01, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> + reg:
> >>> + maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> + interrupts:
> >>> + maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> + clocks:
> >>> + maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> + clock-names:
> >>> + items:
> >>> + - const: tsec
> >>
> >> Drop -names properties if there is only 1.
> >
> > This is added to cover existing binding in tegra210 tree
>
> Existing binding? In what tree? This is mainline, we work only on
> mainline and that's a new binding, so you cannot use argument that there
> is broken code using it. Otherwise what stops anyone to push broken code
> and then claim binding has to look because "existing code has something
> like that"?
>
It seems that your words and action do not add up
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi?h=v6.17-rc1#n181
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists