lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac37lpfte2my6wlrk7omoeaul5spekd4pjzhutlmzanxtshneu@dsxs65meb74r>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:20:48 +0200
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-man@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, 
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, 
	Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] man/man2/mremap.2: describe previously
 undocumented shrink behaviour

On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 06:31:25AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > Since this is documenting old behavior, could we have this patch before
> > the patch documenting new behavior?  Or do you prefer it in this order?
> 
> I think it's fine in this order, it's more convenient for me as it'd be a pain
> to re-order otherwise, and we've waited ~20 years (or longer?) to document this
> so a delay in ordering is probably fine :P
> 
> Cheers, Lorenzo

Okay, that's fine.  Thanks!


Cheers,
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ