[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aJnIRs-XbL34EmGo@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 03:39:02 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: alexjlzheng@...il.com
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] iomap: make sure iomap_adjust_read_range() are
aligned with block_size
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 06:15:51PM +0800, alexjlzheng@...il.com wrote:
> From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
>
> iomap_folio_state marks the uptodate state in units of block_size, so
> it is better to check that pos and length are aligned with block_size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@...cent.com>
> ---
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index fd827398afd2..934458850ddb 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,9 @@ static void iomap_adjust_read_range(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio,
> unsigned first = poff >> block_bits;
> unsigned last = (poff + plen - 1) >> block_bits;
>
> + BUG_ON(*pos & (block_size - 1));
> + BUG_ON(length & (block_size - 1));
We should not add BUG_ON calls like this, please turn these into
WARN_ON_ONCE instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists